By Catherine Bonjukian Patten
I will begin with an open letter to the late not so great ADOLPH HITLER, a man loathed the world over by everyone who has ever heard his name and knows his legacy of blood, deception, greed, cruelty and infamy.
To Adolph Hitler:
100 years ago on April 24 1915 was the start of a mass murder perpetrated by the Ottoman Turks upon the Armenians living in their midst in what is now Turkey but then it was the Armenian part of Turkey. In villages far and wide; Armenians grew in size and families populating city and village and taking over many a professional service to tradesman profession.
Because of this growth of a people, the Turkish Government grew angry at what they deemed as a ‘take over” of their country by Armenians who took advantage of the thriving landscape to pursue any and all professions open and available to them as an educated and knowledgeable people. The Turks were being led by a new leader;
| Mehmed Talaat Pasha |
|
|---|---|
 |
|
| Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire |
who issued an edict on 24 April 1915 to arrest and deport Armenian intellectuals in Constantinople, and requested the Tehcir Law (Temporary Deportation Law) of 30 May 1915 that initiated the Armenian Genocide. He is widely considered the main perpetrator of the genocide.[3][4][5][6]
Out of 2.5 million Armenians living in that section of Turkey; 1.8 Million perished at the hands of the Young Turks and Talaat Pasha who wanted a Turkey for TURKS ONLY. Very similar to what happened to the Jews in Germany during the late 1930s to mid 1940s. And, in fact, you wrote in your book, Mein Kampf, Who speaks today of the extermination of the Armenians?”
Well, it’s been 100 years Adolph & you committed suicide and your German’s had to step off and surrender and today are paying reparations to Jews generations over yet The descendants of Armenians slaughtered in that genocide that started during World War 1 and lasted 5 years ARE STILL ALIVE. In fact, I am a 2nd generation American of Armenian descent and very proud of my heritage and culture. My grandparents both fled Eastern Europe and met here in the United States and this is where my parents met, fell in love and married and had me.
I am their only child but I carry a lot of baggage with me and it’s not so much baggage that I cannot handle it but what it is; is the memory of my grandparents, their stories and the stories of many whom they knew and loved; who had loved and lost both Armenian and Turkish people during those turbulent years during the genocide. I am rich with stories; rich with truth and I will never deny them and others to know the real story of what happened and how it came to be that the Armenians suffered at the hands of people they thought they knew and trusted.
The Turks.
But before I tell you that story here are some others told to me by my mother, my aunt and my cousins who have passed away but are not forgotten.
On my mothers side; her mother came from a rich family who’s mother had died in childbirth of my grandmother so her father grew to hate her. He held her at arms length and she did not have a normal childhood in Smyrna, Turkey where she used to pick figs from the trees. She was close to her older sister who had married and had my cousin Anahid, who was many many years older than I and even my own mother who liked to call her Auntie because she as so much older. When Ana’s father passed away her mother was pursued by the Turkish Mayor of the town who it was said used VooDoo on my Aunt compelling her to fall in love with him and marry. Apparently she was threatened that if she didn’t marry him he would not allow her to live. So to keep her only child alive she obliged him and took him as her husband. It was during their 3rd year of marriage that the genocide started and both of them were murdered by the Turks; even when her Turkish husband tried to save her life both of their lives were taken. My aunt had to run for her life so both she and my grandmother fled to Greece & stayed with relatives there and then after some years went to France to live and then came to America on a boat where she met my grandfather, Haig.
Haig was a diamond setter and a jeweler by trade. He had been born in Bulgaria and had impregnated a young 19 year old girl in his home village and fled the area when she told him she was with child. Not so nice I know but he was 20 years old and did not want to marry and settle down with her. So he fled to Russia where he worked until he was picked up by police at the age of 23 for a crime he did not commit and thrown in jail. There he stayed decrying his innocence for two years until the real criminal was caught and he was allowed to go free. He immediately hopped a boat and served on that boat in steerage to America.
My grandparents met on that boat; my grandmother was on the upper decks and he on the lower but when they landed they were equal in both heart and mind. They married and set up their lives in New York and had 3 children; the middle child being my mom, my aunt was the eldest and my uncle the baby. My grandfather washed the windows of Bloomingdale’s for 5 years through all 4 seasons until he made enough money to own his own jewelry stall inside of Bloomingdales and eventually his own store on the upper east side of New York City where he made a fortune. If it had not been for my uncle, we would have all been rich but he stole most of the money when he took over the business and sunk it lower than ground zero on 9/11. He didn’t give or save any money for anyone else but he got his karma tenfold. When he contracted lung cancer and had six months to live, his bitter ex-wife, who still lived in the million dollar apartment they bought together, had another LAST WILL made and forced him to sign it in his sickness and upon his death took everything and left for Florida where she died and gave the rest to her only child, a 5 time loser with money and women who still lives there and is probably broke right now.
But I digress…
My father’s family lived poor in Amasya, Turkey; 2 older girls and 2 older boys were born to my 12 year old grandmother who married my grandfather who was 21 at the time of the marriage. She was married off early because her family thought it would be better for her to be married at the time of the massacre her husband took his four children and went to America. First they settled in Boston but were duped into thinking that there was more fortune in upstate NY city-Watervliet but the streets were not even paved there and my father grew up the youngest the first American born there with his older brother who was born there before him. Al; that brother was a career soldier and fought in the infantry in WW2 in all the major battles and died a most pitiful death as a drunkard in a house fire of his own doing. Out of the entire family of six kids; the oldest daughter had to return to Amasya Turkey because Americans at Ellis Island refused to allow her into America because she was sick with a disease. My grandfather took her back and left her there to die and my father never found out what happened to her. It left him bitter towards his own father hating him until the day the old man died.
My father’s two eldest brothers were born in Turkey and they witnessed much of the genocide as teenagers but escaped before they had to march for miles until they dropped dead of hunger. Like my mother’s parents; they all escaped the Armenian genocide by running away in the middle of the night but the two boys had seen too much carnage and the younger of them; my uncle MO was scarred so badly that he confused rape and love for one another and when he married treated his beautiful non Armenian wife to such hostilities and abuse which trickled down into his family. His eldest son became a incestuous pedophile at the tender age of 10 years old when he was put in charge of taking care of the younger sister, Laura, who was just born and that relationship continued until Laura was 10 years old and was able to escape her brother’s abuse by winning a piano recital and the gold medal which guaranteed her freedom as her brother enlisted in the Navy and left home.
I know I digressed again and I’m sorry but both sides of my family suffered at the hands of the Turks directly and indirectly.
In fact this is a story my mom’s mother used to tell me when I was a kid. Mr Safian was a friend of a Turk. They had grown up together. They were boyhood chums. The Turk spoke Armenian and Turkish fluently as did Mr Safian. They were in their middle years when the genocide started on April 24, 1915 and the Turks had taken to the streets killing people at random. A Turk pounced upon a stranger cutting his throat and turning him around to face him he discovered that it was none other than his best friend Mr. Aram Safian. The Turk was so distraught that he ended his own life. Two best friends dying on the same day because one of them was from a culture that the other was told to alienate ?
Of course this made no sense and I’m not even sure if Mr. Aram Safian was a real person or not but the lesson was clear. Hating someone for the simple reason they are not like you is disgusting.
I understand it but I just don’t understand why the Turks didn’t get it. I didn’t understand why when I was 28 and working for NYC temp agencies in Manhattan they sent me to work at the UN. This was before we had computers and the typewriter was all the rage and everything was done in duplicate with carbon paper,which I hated because it was inky, messy and horrible. Everything had to be letter perfect and I was in a typing pool of many secretaries and that was terrible too. Then I was placed in the Turkish embassy which I told my councilor to NOT put me there because I am Armenian and these Turks would not sign off on my last name.
The agency told me to change my last name and sign it “CATHERINE EMERY” but I couldn’t do that because I wouldn’t get paid under that name. So a week went by working for the bitch of the century; a Turkish diplomat female who’s name I cannot remember but she made CURELLA DEVILLE look desirable. When she went to sign her name she saw mine. She threw the pen at me and tore up the paper spitting on it. She called security and had me led out of the UN and I was told never to return! This was after I had already made my rounds there as a temp and had worked there for a full month in other embassy’s. It was humiliating and disgusting and she was a TURK and I hated her and will never forget her face. The hate on her face was indescribable; the things she said from her mouth were not repeatable. She was the vision of hate. She was the vision of the Armenian Genocide I knew the truth even if she did not. She told me that I had murdered HER PEOPLE? This is what she was taught by the Turkish Government – all lies.
I haven’t been back to the UN since and I don’t want to go back and in fact I think the UN should be disbanded. Who ever heard of a “peace keeping entity” who has their own army, NATO?
So Adolph things have not changed so much since you died. There is still inequality within the sexes although we are trying everyday to change that. The minorities in American ghettos are fighting a new kind of enemy: The POLICE and a group of politicians called REPUBLICANS and the rich 1% of which you would have been a part of if you had lived. Although if you had lived I can assure you the ALLIES would have killed you after the Nuremberg Trials. Yes, Adoph, America is slowly turning into a wasteland of hatred for our fellowman, woman and children who don’t resemble us white folks. Somehow someone caught onto your message and it seeped into our society of freedom and free speech and desecrated it. I believe that happened around the time JFK was going to reveal what he knew about our government but he was mysteriously killed by a dude who had political leanings that were not the same.
But as always there are patriots who fight the good fight and battle upwards and forever the bad guys and somehow we didn’t learn our history too well. And the Turks are still denying their participation in the Armenian genocide. The Armenian descendants were not given reparations and this year is the 100th anniversary of the genocide that today’s Turks are saying either it never happened or it was a war between two factions in Turkey. Both are not true and it’s funny that France is adamant not to allow Turkey into the new unified European Union until they admit their part in this genocide while another genocide in Africa is taking place also by Muslims who want to rule people by laws that are outdated and by contemporary standards not respectful of religious and political freedoms.
But, Adoph, my people, the Armenians are still alive and are only 6 or 7 million in the world, still mostly Christian. There are 100 million Turks in the world but no one knows them. No one calls them “My Friend”. And in Armenia they are thriving again AND there is a country called ISRAEL where Jews are citizens of the world. The very same people whom you tried to exterminate all those many years ago.
We will never forgot what has happened before; and we strive every day to be better than what you wanted us to be a part of back then. We humans are not perfect, Adolph, but we are strong, resilient and many are still fighting Muslims to this day. You did not win the battle and you did not win the war. In fact you were the biggest loser of them all.
Catherine Bonjukian Patten
THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE OF 4/15/15
Case Study:
The Armenian Genocide,
1915-17
Summary
The Armenian genocide was one of the most massive “root-and-branch” exterminations ever carried out against a defenseless people. In 1915, as World War I raged, the Turkish government (ruler of the Ottoman Empire) decided upon the systematic extermination of most of the male Armenian population, and the forced deportation of the remainder, mostly women, children, and the elderly. The deportation became a death march, with extreme violence and deprivation leading to the death of most of the survivors of the initial gendercide — as was intended. By the time the exhausted and traumatized survivors reached refuge in neighbouring countries, up to three-quarters of the entire Ottoman Armenian population had been exterminated.
The background
Armenians are one of the most ancient peoples of the Near East, having lived in the southern Caucasus region for as long as 3,000 years. Christianized early in the first millennium, they formed by the 19th century the largest non-Muslim population in the Ottoman Empire. Peaceful relations between Armenians and Ottoman Muslims had long been the norm: despite acts of discrimination, Armenians were referred to as “the loyal millet.” This changed in the 19th century, as the forces of nationalism swept both the Ottoman realm and Armenians themselves, and as the Ottoman Empire — “the sick man of Europe” — began to crumble in the face of regional revolts. Calls by European powers for protection of the Armenian population had the opposite effect: the regime of Sultan Abdul Hamid II viewed such outside “intervention” as a threat to its sovereignty, and responded in 1896 with a massive campaign of killing, in which at least 200,000 Armenians died. Though one of the most atrocious imperial acts of the 19th century, it was merely a harbinger of the fullscale genocide that was to descend two decades later.
In 1908, a group of modernization-minded officers — “the Young Turks” — toppled the Ottoman Sultan. Armenians generally welcomed the new regime, viewing it as a progressive alternative to Ottoman despotism. But the “Young Turk” movement (with its political party, the Committee of Union and Progress [CUP]) was rapidly taken over by a small group of fanatical nationalists, headed by the triumvirate of Enver Pasha, Cemal Pasha, and Talat Pasha. The trio began to plot the extermination of the Armenian population, seen as a potentially traitorous “fifth column.”
The events of World War I, which saw Turkey allied with Germany and Austria-Hungary against Britain, France, and Russia, gave these architects of genocide the opportunity they sought to implement their plan. One of the movement’s leading ideologues, Dr. Nazim, told a closed session of the CUP Central Committee in February 1915 that “if this purge is not general and final, it will inevitably lead to problems. Therefore it is absolutely necessary to eliminate the Armenian people in its entirety, so that there is no further Armenian on this earth and the very concept of Armenia is extinguished. We are now at war. We shall never have a more suitable opportunity than this.” (Quoted in G.S. Graber,Caravans to Oblivion: The Armenian Genocide, 1915, pp. 87-88.)
The slaughter began on April 24, 1915, with a classic act of “elitocide”: some 600 Armenian notables, all male, were rounded up in Istanbul and murdered. Today, April 24 is commemorated by Armenians worldwide as “Genocide Memorial Day.” Much worse was to come.
Armenian notables assembled for a photograph
immediately prior to their execution in 1915.
The gendercide against Armenian men
Henry Morgenthau:
Witness to genocide
Like the Jewish holocaust, the Armenian genocide represents a case of a clear-cut, “pre-emptive” targeting of the male population, followed by a “root-and-branch” extermination of as many of the survivors as could be killed outright or driven to death. The two gendercidal strategies followed at the outset were 1) the mobilization of “battle-age” Armenian men for service in the Turkish army, followed by the execution or death through overwork of some hundreds of thousands of them; and 2) the concomitant rounding-up and mass slaughter of remaining community males. The U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, Henry Morgenthau, provided one of the most gut-wrenching descriptions of “The Murder of a Nation” in a report to his superiors, published after the war (the U.S. was at the time neutral in the conflict). He summarized the first strategy as follows:
In the early part of 1915, the Armenian soldiers in the Turkish army were reduced to a new status. Up to that time most of them had been combatants, but now they were all stripped of their arms and transformed into workmen. Instead of serving their country as artillerymen and cavalrymen, these former soldiers now discovered that they had been transformed into road labourers and pack animals. Army supplies of all kinds were loaded on their backs, and, stumbling under the burdens and driven by the whips and bayonets of the Turks, they were forced to drag their weary bodies into the mountains of the Caucasus. Sometimes they would have to plough their way, burdened in this fashion, almost waist high through snow. They had to spend practically all their time in the open, sleeping on the bare ground — whenever the ceaseless prodding of their taskmasters gave them an occasional opportunity to sleep. They were given only scraps of food; if they fell sick they were left where they had dropped, their Turkish oppressors perhaps stopping long enough to rob them of all their possessions — even of their clothes. If any stragglers succeeded in reaching their destinations, they were not infrequently massacred. In many instances Armenian soldiers were disposed of in even more summary fashion, for it now became almost the general practice to shoot them in cold blood. In almost all cases the procedure was the same. Here and there squads of 50 or 100 men would be taken, bound together in groups of four, and then marched out to a secluded spot a short distance from the village. Suddenly the sound of rifle shots would fill the air, and the Turkish soldiers who had acted as the escort would sullenly return to camp. Those sent to bury the bodies would find them almost invariably stark naked, for, as usual, the Turks had stolen all their clothes. In cases that came to my attention, the murderers had added a refinement to their victims’ sufferings by compelling them to dig their graves before being shot.
Morgenthau describes one such episode in July 1915, in which some 2,000 Armenian “amélés” (“such is the Turkish word for soldiers who have been reduced to workmen”) were dispatched from the city of Harpoot, ostensibly for a road-construction project:
The Armenians in that town understood what this meant and pleaded with the Governor for mercy. But this official insisted that the men were not to be harmed, and he even called upon the German missionary, Mr. Ehemann, to quiet the panic, giving that gentleman his word of honour that the ex-soldiers would be protected. Mr. Ehemann believed the Governor and assuaged the popular fear. Yet practically every man of these 2,000 was massacred, and his body thrown into a cave. A few escaped, and it was from these that news of the massacre reached the world. A few days afterward another 2,000 soldiers were sent to Diarbekir. The only purpose of sending these men out in the open country was that they might be massacred. In order that they might have no strength to resist or to escape by flight, these poor creatures were systematically starved. Government agents went ahead on the road, notifying the Kurds that the caravan was approaching and ordering them to do their congenial duty. Not only did the Kurdish tribesmen pour down from the mountains upon this starved and weakened regiment, but the Kurdish women came with butcher’s knives in order that they might gain that merit in Allah’s eyes that comes from killing a Christian. These massacres were not isolated happenings; I could detail many more episodes just as horrible as the one related above …
Decapitated heads of Armenian men
are put on display by the Turks.
Like the opening “elitocide,” this strategy was designed to strip the Armenian community of those who might effectively mobilize and defend it, as Morgenthau notes: “Throughout the Turkish Empire a systematic attempt was made to kill all able-bodied men, not only for the purpose of removing all males who might propagate a new generation of Armenians, but for the purpose of rendering the weaker part of the population an easy prey.” A prominent modern scholar of the genocide, Vahakn Dadrian, concurs: “Though [the] mobilization had many other objectives, it served a major purpose for the swift execution of the plan of genocide. By removing all able-bodied Armenian males from their cities, villages, hamlets, and by isolating them in conditions in which they virtually became trapped, the Armenian community was reduced to a condition of near-total helplessness, thus an easy prey for destruction. It was a masterful stroke as it attained with one blow the three objectives of the operation of traping the victim population: a) dislocation through forcible removal; b) isolation; c) concentration for easy targeting.” (Dadrian, The History of the Armenian Genocide [Berghahn Books, 1995], p. 226.)
With this “conscription-as-gendercide” thus accomplished, the Turkish authorities turned their attention to the remaining male population. The authorities were now free to turn to the destruction of the remainder of the Armenian population. Armenians were told they were to be deported to “safe havens” in third countries. The deportation process, was seen as simply another tool of genocide, as Morgenthau notes: “The real purpose of the deportation was robbery and destruction; it really represented a new method of massacre. When the Turkish authorities gave the orders for these deportations, they were merely giving the death warrant to a whole race; they understood this well, and, in their conversations with me, they made no particular attempt to conceal the fact.”
Before the caravans were dispatched, however, a final assault was made on the few Armenian males remaining. Morgenthau again:
The systematic extermination of the men continued; such males as the persecutions which I have already described had left were now violently dealt with. Before the caravans were started, it became the regular practice to separate the young men from the families, tie them together in groups of four, lead them to the outskirts, and shoot them. Public hangings without trial — the only offense being that the victims were [male] Armenians — were taking place constantly. The gendarmes showed a particular desire to annihilate the educated and the influential. From American consuls and missionaries I was constantly receiving reports of such executions, and many of the events which they described will never fade from my memory. At Angora all Armenian men from fifteen to seventy were arrested, bound together in groups of four, and sent on the road in the direction of Caesarea. When they had travelled five or six hours and had reached a secluded valley, a mob of Turkish peasants fell upon them with clubs, hammers, axes, scythes, spades, and saws. Such instruments not only caused more agonizing deaths than guns and pistols, but, as the Turks themselves boasted, they were more economical, since they did not involve the waste of powder and shell. In this way they exterminated the whole male population of Angora, including all its men of wealth and breeding, and their bodies, horribly mutilated, were left in the valley, where they were devoured by wild beasts. After completing this destruction, the peasants and gendarmes gathered in the local tavern, comparing notes and boasting of the number of “‘giaours” that each had slain. In Trebizond the men were placed in boats and sent out on the Black Sea; gendarmes would follow them in boats, shoot them down, and throw their bodies into the water. When the signal was given for the caravans to move, therefore, they almost invariably consisted of women, children, and old men. Any one who could possibly have protected them from the fate that awaited them had been destroyed.
The gendercide against Armenian women
An artist’s depiction of the atrocities unleashed
on Armenian women during the forced deportations.
The forced deportation of the women, childerly, and elderly left alive after the gendercide against Armenian men gave rise to some of the most hellish scenes in recorded history. Some Armenian women and children were offered the alternative of conversion to Islam and subsequent slavery in Turkish homes, but it is generally held that only a thousand or so accepted. The rest were driven from their homeland at bayonet-point, and forced to run a vicious gauntlet of soldiers and marauding tribespeople. “Women who lagged behind were bayoneted on the road, or pushd over precipices, or over bridges,” writes the historian Arnold Toynbee (quoted in Leo Kuper, Genocide, p. 111). Morgenthau offers an unforgettable description of their torment:
The whole course of the journey became a perpetual struggle with the Moslem inhabitants. Detachments of gendarmes would go ahead, notifying the Kurdish tribes that their victims were approaching, and Turkish peasants were also informed that their long-waited opportunity had arrived. The Government even opened the prisons and set free the convicts, on the understanding that they should behave like good Moslems to the approaching Armenians. Thus every caravan had a continuous battle for existence with several classes of enemies — their accompanying gendarmes, the Turkish peasants and villagers, the Kurdish tribes and bands of Chétés or brigands. And we must always keep in mind that the men who might have defended these wayfarers had nearly all been killed or forced into the army as workmen, and that the exiles themselves had been systematically deprived of all weapons before the journey began. … Such as escaped … attacks in the open would find new terrors awaiting them in the Moslem villages. Here the Turkish roughs would fall upon the women, leaving them sometimes dead from their experiences or sometimes ravingly insane. After spending a night in a hideous encampment of this kind, the exiles, or such as had survived, would start again the next morning. The ferocity of the gendarmes apparently increased as the journey lengthened, for they seemed almost to resent the fact that part of their charges continued to live. Frequently any one who dropped on the road was bayoneted on the spot. The Armenians began to die by hundreds from hunger and thirst. Even when they came to rivers, the gendarmes, merely to torment them, would sometimes not let them drink. The hot sun of the desert burned their scantily clothed bodies, and their bare feet, treading the hot sand of the desert, became so sore that thousands fell and died or were killed where they lay. Thus, in a few days, what had been a procession of normal human beings became a stumbling horde of dust-covered skeletons, ravenously looking for scraps of food, eating any offal that came their way, crazed by the hideous sights that filled every hour of their existence, sick with all the diseases that accompany such hardships and privations, but still prodded on and on by the whips and clubs and bayonets of their executioners.
“The passage of rivers, and especially of the Euphrates, was always an occasion of wholesale murder,” writes Toynbee. Morgenthau notes that “In a loop of the river near Erzinghan … the thousands of dead bodies created such a barrage that the Euphrates changed its course for about a hundred yards.”
Starving Armenian woman and child
after reaching “refuge.”
The end result of these torments was standardly near-total extermination. Morgenthau describes a typical convoy consisting of “18,000 souls,” of whom “just 150 women and children reached their destination. A few of the rest, the most attractive, were still living as captives of the Kurds and Turks; all the rest were dead.” “The last survivors often staggered into Aleppo [Syria] naked,” writes Toynbee; “every shred of their clothing had been torn from them on the way. Witnesses who saw their arrival remark that there was not one young or pretty face to be seen among them, and there was assuredly none surviving that was truly old …”
Their suffering was not over: many who had survived the earlier rampage starved to death or died of disease in the squalid camps established in Syria and Mesopotomia (Iraq). Massacres of Armenians by Turks continued even after the final defeat of the empire in 1918-19, with the Turkish invasion of the independent Republic of Armenia (see below).
“Whatever crimes the most perverted instincts of the human mind can devise, and whatever refinements of persecution and injustice the most debased imagination can conceive, became the daily misfortunes of this devoted people,” Morgenthau summarized. “I am confident that the whole history of the human race contains no such horrible episode as this. The great massacres of the past seem almost insignificant when compared with the sufferings of the Armenian race in 1915.”
Although the bulk of the slaughter was carried out in 1915, largescale massacres of Armenians continued until the end of World War I and even afterward. “In the last months of the war between 50,000 and 100,000 Armenians were massacred by Turkish troops in the various Caucasus campaigns. To this figure must be added the results of genocidal actions taken by Turkish nationalist forces in Cilicia [the Mediterranean region of southeastern Turkey] … after the Mudros Armistice (October 30, 1918).” (Graber, Caravans to Oblivion, p. 148.)
How many died?
Morgenthau, working with limited information, claimed that “at least 600,000 people” had been killed in the genocide, “and perhaps as many as 1,000,000.” Modern estimates tend to be higher, ranging from 1.1 to 1.8 million killed out of about 2.5 million Armenians alive in the Ottoman lands at the onset of the slaughter in 1915. As a proportion of population, it is believed that between half and three-quarters of all Ottoman Armenians died in the genocide. This is a death rate comparable to the Jewish holocaust, in which some two-thirds of European Jews were killed.
Who was responsible?
Primary responsibility for the genocide must rest with the trio of Enver Pasha, Cemal Pasha, and Talat Pasha, who dominated the Central Committee of the “Young Turk” government and planned the systematic extermination and expulsion of the Armenian population. At the ground-level, however, the genocide was carried out by many thousands of Turkish officers and soldiers, along with ordinary citizens (including Kurdish tribespeople) who saw the persecution of the Armenians as an ideal opportunity for plunder, rape, and kidnapping. The Armenians’ status as a religious minority, and their reputation for higher levels of education and wealth than many other groups in the Ottoman Empire, made them the target of popular hatred and envy. The comparison with the position and fate of Jews in Germany and the Nazi-occupied territories is inescapable. As the Knights of Vartan Armenian Research Center has pointed out, there are in fact profound similarities between the Armenian and Jewish genocides. “Both people adhere to an ancient religion. Both were religious minorities of their respective states. Both have a history of persecution. … Both are talented and creative minorities who have been persecuted out of envy and obscurantism.”
The aftermath
Turkey’s defeat in World War I, and the consequent collapse of the Ottoman Empire, offered surviving Armenians an opportunity for national self-realization. In 1918, an independent Republic of Armenia was declared. U.S. President Woodrow Wilson was granted the right to draw up the boundaries of a new Armenian nation, formalized at the Treaty of Sèvres in 1920. However, the Turkish government, under nationalist leader Kemal Ataturk, rapidly renounced the Treaty. In collusion with the newly-created Soviet Union, the Turks invaded Armenia and reconquered six of the former western Ottoman provinces granted to Armenia under the Treaty, along with the Armenian provinces of Kars and Ardahan. What remained of Armenia was swallowed up by the invading Soviet armies. After a brief period of cooperation with Armenian nationalist forces, the Soviets took complete control in 1921, and Armenia was incorporated into the Transcaucasian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic (SFSR) in 1922. A separate Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic was created in 1936. The Armenian Communist Party was the only political party permitted to function under Soviet rule, which remained in place until 1991, when Armenians overwhelmingly voted for secession from the collapsing USSR. In the late 1980s, the boundary established between Armenia and Soviet Azerbaijan became the subject of bitter conflict, as Armenians fought to unite the predominantly Armenian enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh with the new Armenian republic. A ceasefire was signed in 1994, but the enclave remains one of the “hot spots” of the volatile Caucasus region.
For many decades, the horrors inflicted upon the Armenian people were little-known in the outside world. Indeed, the Nazis’ genocide against the Jews, the Poles, and others may have been facilitated by the “memory hole” into which the Armenians had fallen. “Who today remembers the extermination of the Armenians?” mused Adolf Hitler in 1939, as he ordered a merciless assault on the civilian population of occupied Poland.
In recent decades, fortunately, the lie has been put to Hitler’s rhetorical question. Armenian scholars and activists, joined by numerous sympathizers around the world, have worked to research and publicize the genocide, and to gather the testimony of survivors before they pass from the earth. Gradually, much of the outside world has acknowledged the scale and character of the slaughter. The Europan Parliament in 1987 voted in favour of recognizing the Armenian Genocide, as did the Russian parliament in 1994. Also in 1994, Israel, after decades of state-sponsored suppression of the facts of the genocide (which was felt to distract from the “exceptional” character of the Jewish holocaust), informally recognized that the fate of the Armenians “was not war,” but “certainly massacre and genocide, something the world must remember,” in the words of Deputy Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin.
The major exception to the rule, predictably, is Turkey. In the brief interim (1918-20) between the Ottoman collapse and the ascendancy of the nationalist Ataturk regime, the Turkish government did hold trials for dozens of accused war-criminals, but only fifteen death sentences were passed, and only three insignificant actors actually executed. (The three main organizers of the genocide were subsequently killed — Enver Pasha while leading an anti-Bolshevik revolt in Turkestan in 1922, and Cemal Pasha and Talat Pasha by Armenian assassination squads, who tracked them down to deliver summary justice.) The Ataturk government effectively cancelled the court-martial process (Ataturk himself claiming that the Armenians killed were “victims of foreign intrigues” and guilty of abusing “the privileges granted them”). (For more on the trials, see Vahakn Dadrian, “The Turkish Military Tribunal’s Prosecution of the Authors of the Armenian Genocide”, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 11: 1 [Spring 1997].)
Since the early 1920s, successive Turkish governments have maintained an ostentatious silence on the subject, broken only to issue denials that the genocide ever occurred, and denunciations of those who assert that it did. In 1990, for example, the Turkish ambassador to the U.S. dismissed the holocaust as resulting from “a tragic civil war initiated by Armenian nationalists.” The Turkish government has also devoted millions of dollars to a propaganda campaign aimed at western universities and a handful of compliant scholars. (See Amy Magaro Rubin, “Critics Accuse Turkish Government of Manipulating Scholarship”, Chronicle of Higher Education, 27 October 1995.) They have had support from NATO and other western countries, which view Turkey as a linchpin of “stability” in the Near East. In the United States, for example, “conforming to Turkey’s wishes, all congressional resolutions to recognize the Armenian Genocide have been opposed by the Reagan, Bush and Clinton administrations, and all such resolutions have thus far been defeated.” (Levon Chorbajian, “Introduction,” in Levon Chorbajian and George Shirinian, eds., Studies in Comparative Genocide, p. xxvi.)
As Stanley Cohen of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem puts it:
The nearest successful example [of “collective denial”] in the modern era is the 80 years of official denial by successive Turkish governments of the 1915-17 genocide against the Armenians in which some 1.5 million people lost their lives. This denial has been sustained by deliberate propaganda, lying and coverups, forging documents, suppression of archives, and bribing scholars. The West, especially the United States, has colluded by not referring to the massacres in the United Nations, ignoring memorial ceremonies, and surrendering to Turkish pressure in NATO and other strategic arenas of cooperation.
