Posts by JimKouri:

    Hillary’s Email Exchange with Gen. Petraeus Reveals Serious Lack of Judgement

    October 25th, 2016

    By Jim Kouri.

     

    About 1,000 emails between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former commander of the U.S. Army’s Central Command (CENTCOM), Gen. David Petraeus, were reported to be missing from the tens of thousands of emails turned over to the State Department by Clinton’s minions in December 2014, according to Fox News Channel’s industrious chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge on Friday.

    Catherine Herridge is a graduate of Harvard University and the is a graduate of Columbia University School of Jounalism.Catherine Herridge is a graduate of Harvard University and the is a graduate of Columbia University School of Jounalism.

    Herridge, a graduate of Harvard University and the prestigious Graduate School of Journalism at Columbia University, reported that a number of documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch provided interesting communications between two of President Barack Obama’s top officials.

    The documents reveal that Mrs. Clinton — the Democratic Party’s presidential heir apparent —  advised Petraeus that he should begin sending official emails to her using a private Internet address rather than her State Department “Dot-Gov” email address which is meant to be utilized for all of her government work, including emails containing classified information.

    Among the documents released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation was a heavily redacted FBI interview summary from Aug. 17, 2015. In it, a State Department worker from the Information, Programs and Services (IPS) section, which processed FOIA applications, wrote about how Petraeus’ records weren’t among the official emails turned over to IPS by the Clinton team, which included Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, and others.

    “CENTCOM records shows approximately 1,000 work-related emails between Clinton’s personal email and General David PETRAEUS, former Commander of CENTCOM and former Director of the CIA. Most of those 1,000 emails were not believed to be included in the 30,000 emails that IPS was reviewing. Out of the 30,000 emails, IPS only had a few emails from or related to PETRAEUS as well as a few related to Leon PANETTA, former Secretary of Defense,” Herridge reported based on her interview with an anonymous source.

    Corruption Investigation

    Judicial Watch reported that its officials released Roughly 1,000 emails between Hillary Clinton and Gen. David Petraeus were thought to be missing from the 30,000 emails provided by Clinton’s team to the State Department in December 2014, according to the newly released FBI investigative files.

    Additional documents obtained through a federal lawsuit by Judicial Watch show Clinton had directed Petraeus to send her emails at her personal address, which was used for all government work during her tenure as secretary of state.

    In a heavily redacted FBI interview summary from Aug. 17, 2015, a State Department employee from the Office of Information and Programs and Services (IPS), which handles Freedom of Information Act requests, discussed how Petraeus’ records apparently were not among the work-related emails provided by the former secretary’s team.

    “CENTCOM records shows approximately 1,000 work-related emails between Clinton’s personal email and General David PETRAEUS, former Commander of CENTCOM and former Director of the CIA. Most of those 1,000 emails were not believed to be included in the 30,000 emails that IPS was reviewing. Out of the 30,000 emails, IPS only had a few emails from or related to PETRAEUS as well as a few related to Leon PANETTA, former Secretary of Defense.”the email correspondence between former Secretary of State Clinton and Gen. Petraeus, in which she had what she termed “blackberry blues” over her inability to use her BlackBerry inside her secure office,” Herridge reported.

    “The FBI recovered many of the new emails from those that Clinton failed to turn over. These emails are government documents and not personal emails, as Clinton claims in defending her decision to not turn over 30,000 emails sent or received by her as secretary of state.  The emails also show she knew about the security issues of her BlackBerry use [and yet denied recalling anything about it or refused to answer questions],” according to Judicial Watch’s press statement.

    Within the new batch of email exchanges, Mrs. Clinton also wrote to Petraeus, “If there is ever anything you need or want me to know, pls use this personal email address – hr15@att.blackberry.net – when corresponding [with me].”

    Petraeus, who would later be the subject of his own scandal and mismanagement of classified material, during the time of the email exchange with Hillary Clinton, was in-charge of U.S. military efforts in Northeast Africa, across the Middle East, and into Central and South Asia.

    His command included overseeing counter-terrorism and other operations in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Egypt.

     

    Sample Communications Between H and Petraeus

    The emails included the following:

    —————————————————————–

    On January 28, 2008, only one week after becoming secretary of state, Clinton sent an email to Petraeus from her non-state.gov email account apologizing for her “tardy” response to his earlier email and blaming it on what she termed “blackberry blues”:

    From: H [mailto:hdr22@clintonmail.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 9:33 PM
    To: Petraeus, David H. GEN USA
    Subject: Re: Follow up

    David – Sorry to be so tardy in responding. I’ve had blackberry blues. I can’t use mine all day long since my whole office is a SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility]. I don’t yet have a computer and I had to change my address and lost some of my traffic.

    (The State Department represented to a federal court that Hillary Clinton did not have a State Department computer.)

    —————————————————————

    Shortly before taking office, Clinton emailed Petraeus asking that he use only her personal email account when contacting her. At the time, Petraeus was the Commander of the United States Central Command:

    From: hr15@att.blackberry.net
    Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 3:57 PM
    To: Petraeus, David H. GEN USA
    Subject: Follow up

    Dear Dave,

    Thanks for giving me so much of your time the last two nights. I appreciated our conversations and enjoyed the chance to see you and Richard becoming acquainted. I’m looking forward to working w you both. If there is ever anything you need or want me to know, pls use this personal email address. All the best, Hillary.

    ————————————————————-

    Judicial Watch’s 25 Written Interrogatives

    Judicial Watch specifically asked about Clinton’s BlackBerry use as part of the twenty-five questions submitted on August 30 to Clinton as ordered by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan:

    On March 6, 2009, Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Eric J. Boswell wrote in an Information Memo to your Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills, that he “cannot stress too strongly, however, that any unclassified BlackBerry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving email, and exploiting calendars.” A March 11, 2009 email states that, in a management meeting with the assistant secretaries, you approached Assistant Secretary Boswell and mentioned that you had read the “IM” and that you “get it.” Did you review the March 6, 2009 Information Memo, and, if so, why did you continue using an unclassified BlackBerry to access your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business? Copies of the March 6, 2009 Information Memo and March 11, 2009 email are attached as Exhibit A for your review.

    Response: Secretary Clinton objects to Interrogatory No. 14 as seeking information outside the scope of the permitted discovery in this case. The Court’s May 4, 2016 Order provides that Plaintiff is not entitled to discovery on the subject of “cybersecurity issues.” Dkt. #73, at 13. 

     

    Hillary's Girl Friday Huma Abedin was mentioned a number of times in the Wikileaks documents.
    Hillary’s Girl Friday Huma Abedin was mentioned a number of times in the Wikileaks documents.

    In a November 13, 2010 email exchange with Huma Abedin about problems with your clintonemail.com email account, you wrote to Ms. Abedin, in response to her suggestion that you use a State Department email account or release your email address to the Department, “Let’s get a separate address or device.” Why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business after agreeing on November 13, 2010 to “get a separate address or device?” Include in your answer whether by “address” you meant an official State Department email account (i.e., a “state.gov” account) and by “device” you meant a State Department-issued BlackBerry. A copy of the November 13, 2010 email exchange with Ms. Abedin is attached as Exhibit B for your review.

    Response: Secretary Clinton recalls that her November 13, 2010 e-mail exchange with Huma Abedin attached as Exhibit B to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories was triggered by a problem with the State Department’s telephone system. When Secretary Clinton wrote, “This is not a good system,” she was referring to the way in which the State Department would notify her of telephone calls. Secretary Clinton does not recall what precisely she meant by the words “address” or “device.” To the best of her recollection, she meant that she was willing to use a State Department e-mail account or device if it would resolve the problems with receiving telephone calls, so long as her personal e-mails with family and friends would not be accessible to the State Department. Following this e-mail exchange, the State Department changed the way in which it notified Secretary Clinton of telephone calls, resolving the problem that triggered this e-mail. 

    Email exchanges among your top aides and assistants in August 30, 2011 discuss providing you with a State Department-issued BlackBerry or State Department email address. In the course of these discussions, State Department Executive Secretary Stephen Mull wrote, “[W]e are working to provide the Secretary per her request a Department issued BlackBerry to replace her personal unit which is malfunctioning (possibly because of her personal email server is down). We will prepare two versions for her to use – one with an operating State Department email account (which would mask her identity, but which would also be subject to FOIA requests).” Similarly, John Bentel, the Director of Information and Records Management in the Executive Secretariat, wrote, “You should be aware that any email would go through the Department’s infrastructure and [be] subject to FOIA searches.” Did you request a State-Department issued Blackberry or a State Department email account in or around August 2011, and, if so, why did you continue using your personal device and clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business instead of replacing your device and account with a State Department-issued BlackBerry or a State Department email account? Include in your answer whether the fact that a State Department-issued BlackBerry or a State Department email address would be subject to FOIA affected your decision. Copies of the email exchanges are attached as Exhibit C for your review.

    Response: Secretary Clinton does not recall requesting a State Department-issued Blackberry or a Department e-mail account in or around August 2011. 

    “These new emails show the truth that the separate email system was never a matter of ‘convenience’ for Mrs. Clinton.  She wanted to hide her emails from the American people.  It’s now clear why she deleted or withheld so many and why Mrs. Clinton didn’t recall or declined to answer questions about her email security,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

    “And her request to Petraeus while he was the Commander of the United States Central Command to communicate with her solely at her unsecure email address shows Hillary Clinton’s willful negligence in handling national defense information,” Fitton added.

    Comments Off on Hillary’s Email Exchange with Gen. Petraeus Reveals Serious Lack of Judgement

    KKK Grand Dragon says he supports Hillary Clinton in video

    August 29th, 2016

     

    By Jim Kouri

    The Hillary Clinton presidential campaign has received more than $20,000 in donations from members of the Ku Klux Klan, according to a well-known member of the hate group. Will Quigg, a KKK Grand Dragon, announced on March 13, 2016, that the KKK supports Hillary Clinton for President of the United States.

    Image result for KKK Grand Dragon says he supports Hillary Clinton in video

    “Why is the media not reporting on this? It is real simple: most news people want Hillary Clinton as President. Just look what they did to Donald Trump over David Duke. Yet nothing on Will Quigg supporting Hillary Clinton,” said Michael Baker, a former prosecutor and political strategist. “During a celebration for Republican Sen. Strom Thurmond, now deceased, Sen. Trent Lott mentioned how America would have benefited from having Thurmond as president when he ran as a ‘Dixiecrat Democrat.’ For days after that, Lott was hounded until he stepped down as Republican leader in the U.S. Senate. But Hillary went further than Lott but received a big ‘pass’ from her media sycophants,” said Baker.

    Quigg, the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan’s California chapter and responsible for recruitment in all of the western United States, is less keen to give Mr Trump the dubious benefit of his support.

    “We want Hillary Clinton to win. She is telling everybody one thing, but she has a hidden agenda. She’s telling everybody what they want to hear so she can get elected, because she’s Bill Clinton’s wife, she’s close to the Bushes. [But] once she’s in the presidency, she’s going to come out and her true colors are going to show,” Quigg claimed in a report appearing in the London Telegraph in the United Kingdom

    Hillary Clinton’s new campaign strategy is to claim that Donald Trump is the candidate of the KKK, conveniently leaving out the fact that Hillary herself described Robert Byrd – a KKK leader (Grand Kleagle), who once called black people “mongrels”  and fought against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as her “friend and mentor”.

    Yesterday, the Clinton campaign released which “makes the case that Donald Trump is the candidate of racists, white supremacists and neo-Nazis.”

    Comments Off on KKK Grand Dragon says he supports Hillary Clinton in video

    Children of the Caliphate: Jihadists increase use of kids as terrorists, bombers

    August 24th, 2016

    By Jim Kouri.

    While thousands of “Muslim refugees” are pouring into the United States thanks to President Barack Obama’s politically-correct agenda — and Hillary Clinton’s promise to carry on that agenda if she’s elected President — there is an Islamist program geared towards using children as young as ten-years-old to launch attacks including suicide bombings.

     

    Islamic Children

     

    A suicide bomber with suspected links to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) killed 54 people, including 22 children, at a Kurdish wedding in Turkey on Saturday.

    The attack in the Turkish city of Gaziantep is said to be the deadliest this year, according to police officials. The suicide bomber in this attack is reported to be as young as 12-years-old, President Tayyip Erdogan said on Turkish television on Sunday. He also stated that the evidence collected by police and forensic specials points to ISIS.

    News reports in the Middle East claim that the improvised explosive device (IED) used was the same as the IED employed in the July 2015 suicide attacks in the border town of Suruc and the October 2015 bombing of a rally in Ankara.

    Then on Monday police officers in Iraq successfully arrested an 11-year-old boy wearing an explosive belt wrapped around his waist.  The child reportedly told the officers that ISIS terrorists had abducted him and forced him to carry out and attack.

    According to intelligence analysts, the group controls an army of child jihadists, they call the “cubs of the caliphate.”  The Islamists seek to indoctrinate children at ISIS-run grade schools, “drugging some of them and indoctrinating them with the group’s own radical version of Islam,” according to analysts.

    Besides the recruitment of Americans by Islamic terrorist groups — especially American teenagers and young adults — using advanced methods using the Internet’s social media websites, within the Middle East as well as parts of Africa and Asia there is an intense drive to indoctrinate and train local youths to carry out terrorist attacks and activities. Their youth program is best described as a cross between the Boy Scouts and the Chicago-based Vice Lords street gang.

    For example, the powerful and deadly ISIS recently boasted about the success of its recruitment and training program that is increasing their numbers on a daily basis. These junior jihadists are not those traveling from the West, but local youngsters who are easily swayed to embrace radical Islam and to undergo intensive, sometimes dangerous, training at camps set up with young people in mind.

    In January of this year, ISIS commanders bragged about their plans to expand their reach into Afghanistan and they are fulfilling their claim. Within three months of their message of expansion, they launched a suicide attack that killed at least 35 people in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, an attack believed to have been purposely downplayed by President Barack Obama and his national security team.

    While ISIS is still less powerful than the Taliban, the fact that they are recruiting and expanding operations in the already fragile nation of Afghanistan has worried U.S. and NATO military commanders and intelligence agents.

    But ISIS isn’t alone and it isn’t the first terrorist group to devote a lot of its resources to recruitment and training of children and teenagers. That distinction belongs to the Palestinian terrorist groups such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) who are inhabiting the Gaza Strip which borders Israel.

    Comments Off on Children of the Caliphate: Jihadists increase use of kids as terrorists, bombers

    Intelligence agents: Obama falsified reports regarding ISIS, Al Nusra Front

    August 15th, 2016

    By Jim Kouri.

    Dozens of U.S. intelligence analysts formally filed complaints that their honest intelligence evaluations regarding the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and al-Qaida’s branch Al Nusra Front in Syria were altered by superiors to prop up President Barack Obama’s false proclamations that he and his “national security team” are winning the war.

    Both Obama and Clinton are on record saying the Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate group.

    Both Obama and Clinton are on record saying the Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate group.

    Fox News Channel’s judicial analyst, former Bergen County, New Jersey, Criminal Court Judge Andrew Napolitano, told Fox anchorman Bret Baier that “charges of personnel at U.S Central Command (CENTCOM) allegedly destroying evidence to minimize negative assessments of the administration’s fight against ISIS is a big deal and I’m sorry to say I think it’s going to go nowhere in the Obama administration.” Unfortunately, the judge was absolutely correct — the news media couldn’t care less about the report that questioned Obama’s mendacity.

    Meanwhile the Republican Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee was quoted as openly accusing personnel at CENTCOM of deleting files that might reveal their intelligence assessments were “doctored up”  to show U.S. success against Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) jihadists.

    “We have been made aware that both files and emails have been deleted by personnel at CENTCOM and we expect that the Department of Defense will provide these and all other relevant documents to the committee,” Rep. Devin Nunes said at a hearing on worldwide threats facing the United States.

    As previously reported in the Conservative Base, Fox News’ Chief Intelligence Correspondent Catherine Herridge was informed by her anonymous but reliable source, who is an associate of the CENTCOM intelligence analysts, that they were instructed to avoid negative reports. In fact, they received two emails saying the analysts needed to “cut it out” and “toe the line,” when submitting reports.

    In an earlier report published by the Conservative Base, it was reported that some of the  intelligence community’s top analysts informed the Pentagon’s official watchdog that their reports have been systematically edited to backup President Obama’s — and his national security team’s — false narrative in which they claimed the air campaign against ISIS is more successful than it actually is.

    isis landsAn example of this alleged fraud was the sworn testimony of General Lloyd Austin, commander of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). Gen. Austin testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee that an multi-million dollar military program that was supposed to train a large number of Syrian rebels — about 1,000 was the number circulated by the White House —  to fight ISIS  resulted in producing an embarrassing four or five anti-ISIS fighters for front lines.

    According to the general’s testimony, American taxpayers are pouring an estimated $9 million per day on the war against ISIS since August 2014 and we have only Obama’s almost constant self-congratulations and amateur comedy act poking fun at those who point out the abysmal results of his foreign policy in the Middle East.

    Two of the intelligence analysts assigned to the U.S. Central Command, or CENTCOM, wrote an official complaint and sent it to the Defense Department’s inspector general in July accusing their superiors of doctoring up their reports to make it appear that the Obama administration is winning against ISIS. Since then, more than 50 analysts given their own complaints in the hopes that someone in the U.S. government takes action. Some of those 50 analysts are officially employed by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and others are contractors.

    Their complaints accuse their superiors that at times key elements contained in their intelligence reports were removed. They said that in the end an intelligence assessment did not reflect the analysts’ conclusions.

    Unfortunately, the reports by Fox News’ Herridge, the Conservative Base and other news and commentary publications aren’t the whole story of deception and fraud. The complaints go far beyond alleged altering of reports. Some of the complaints have to do with accusations that some senior leaders at CENTCOM created an unprofessional and hostile work environment.

    One source who is very familiar the contents of one of the written complaints sent to the inspector general claims that the word “Stalinist” was used to describe officials overseeing CENTCOM’s intelligence analysis. “Although the analysts should be praised for not only coming forward as whistleblowers, but they should also be congratulated for blowing the whistle in a mature and constructive manner. This is one of the worst allegations of government corruption I’ve heard about since the days of Richard M. Nixon and Watergate,” said former military intelligence operative and police detective unit commander Franklyn Lovell, Jr.

    “There’s only one problem: the reporters in the early 1970s despised Nixon and were more than happy to bash him, but the news media today loves Obama and although they will publish or air negative stories about him, they don’t want to see him fail. In fact, I will bet that these reporters already wrote their ‘comeback kid’ news stories in anticipation that nothing will come of any of the scandals in the Obama administration,” said Lovell.

     

    Comments Off on Intelligence agents: Obama falsified reports regarding ISIS, Al Nusra Front

    Hillary Clinton’s True Legacy: Witness Tampering and Money Laundering

    August 11th, 2016

     By Jim Kouri.

     

     

    A number of Conservative Base readers — the majority of them current or retired law enforcement and intelligence officers — have said they believed the Hillary Clinton email scandal was created by her, her attorneys, her crew of sycophants and some members of the news media in order to direct attention away from what may be considered intentional criminal enterprises. “It’s simple: they chose a scandal to have the FBI investigate that would be confusing to most Americans and fodder for the intellectual elite to debate. Meanwhile, no one — especially the Democratic Party controlled news media — conducted anything even resembling an investigation of the Clinton’s cash-cow charity known as the Clinton Foundation in which millions and millions of dollars were laundered and only a dime out of every dollar went to help any suffering human beings,” said former New York police officer and corporate security director Emanuel Lopez-Frecchio.

    Both Obama and Clinton are on record saying the Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate group.
    Both Obama and Clinton are on record saying the Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate group.

    While presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton claims the U.S. State Department was successful in achieving its tasks under her direction, it appears that once again the former First Lady and Senator is exaggerating her successes during her tenure as Secretary of State. On the campaign trail, Clinton – who claims she still believes there is gender inequality and continued bullying of woman in America – is remaining silent about a new report that tells voters a different story about her fighting for women’s rights. For example, reported incidents of sexual harassment at the State Department have almost tripled under both Secretary Clinton and current Secretary John Kerry, according to an inspector general’s report.

    “The female politician who says she wants to be women’s ‘champion’ as President of the United States, helped her allegedly lecherous husband to all but destroy Bill Clinton’s accusers. In fact, Hillary [Clinton] lead a special ‘war room’ committee to help cover up what she termed ‘bimbo eruptions.’ I guess now she needs the bimbos’ votes,” said a former corporate security director, Lester Sorrenson. who specialized in investigating hostile work environment cases.

    “Because her husband was being sued by one of the women targeted by the Clinton clan, why were there no charges brought against Hillary Clinton for witness tampering? These people got away with not just some minor violations but with major infractions including intimidating witnesses and other criminal conspiracies,” Sorrenson said.

    While Hillary Clinton is campaigning on both her support for women and her intention to help woman overcome their powerlessness in the nation’s workplaces, her own personal record on protecting women and their civil rights appears lacking in the latest report. Inspector General Steve Linck shows a disturbing increase in reported harassment investigations within the State Department during the past few years and it recommends a mandatory harassment training program for all employees at all levels within the department.

    In the section regarding key findings, the report states: “A significant increase in reported harassment inquiries in the Department of State over the past few fiscal years supports the need for mandatory harassment training for Department of State employees.”

    The IG noted that reported harassment incidents rose from 88 cases in 2011 to 248 in 2014, Kerry’s second year as secretary. According to former sex crimes investigator and forensic psychologist Karen King-Howard, it’s probably a “safe bet that if this report – which was reported in the news media on Friday – gains traction in the news media, Clinton and Kerry will point fingers at one another or work together to find a scapegoat to throw under the Obama bus.”

    Besides those considered formal complaints lodged through proper channels, there were hundreds of informal complaints that were made known during the same period. In 2014, 43 percent of new complaints filed involved accusations of harassment or unfair hiring or promotion practices. Meanwhile 38 percent of the complaints alleged sex discrimination or workplace reprisals.

    Bill Clinton and his entourage allegedly visiting Jeffrey Epstein's "Sin Island."
    Bill Clinton and his entourage allegedly visiting Jeffrey Epstein’s “Sin Island.”

    “While Mrs. Clinton is out there criticizing men and businesses about their alleged mistreatment of women, on her watch at the State Department female and male employees were sexually harassed, bullied and exposed to a hostile work environment. It’s the epitome of hypocrisy but then again that’s par for the course with the Bill and Hillary Clinton team,” said a political strategist and former prosecuting attorney Michael Baker.

    “I guess now she needs the bimbos’ votes,” said Carlos Murphy, a former corporate security director who specialized in investigating hostile work environment cases. “How many women were ridiculed, harassed and smeared by our wannabe ‘champion?’ And she even had the majority of news outlets helping her avoid scrutiny,” said Murphy, a former New York police detective.

    World’s Most Expansive Money Laundering Operation

    According civil-rights activist and radio talk host Kevin Jackson, a/k/a The Black Sphere, the Clinton family’s charity is arguably the most expansive money laundering operation in the world. He then explained how it works:

    1. You create a separate foreign “charity.” In this case one in Canada run by Clinton comrade Frank Giustra, whose name is mentioned several times in the bestselling book Clinton Cash.

    2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did – contributing mega millions. I’m sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).

    3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

    4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. The Canadian “charity” includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk. Also note that Democratic vice-presidential nominee Tim Kaine as governor did exactly the same thing: took over $150,000 as a gift.

    5. The Clinton Foundation then spends some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Experts estimate that The Clinton Foundation has donated no more than 10 percent of the donations to charitable pursuits. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton’s lavish salaries, and lavish lifestyle, particularly travel, and virtually all tax free. In one year alone, the foundation spent over $8 million in travel expenses.

    6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world’s best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these “clerical errors” and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

    7. Net result – foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

    This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.

    Comments Off on Hillary Clinton’s True Legacy: Witness Tampering and Money Laundering

    News media attack Cruz national security advisor appointee

    March 18th, 2016

    By Jim Kouri.

     

    Taking a break from their constant anti-Trump/pro-Clinton juggernaut, the news industry is reporting that GOP presidential candidate Ted Cruz chose a former Reagan Administration administration official — who is now the head of a national security think-tank — as his security policy adviser. But rather than announcing the appointment and listing his achievements, reporters ran to a suspicious left-wing “watchdog”to denigrate Cruz’s new advisor.
    The Hill news web site, which is used by many top news organizations for U.S. government coverage, called Cruz appointee Frank Gaffney an “archconservative” and noted that he is “one of America’s most notorious Islamophobes.”

     

    New Ted Cruz national security adviser, Frank Gaffney.

    New Ted Cruz national security adviser, Frank Gaffney.
    Gaffney is the president of the conservative think-tank Center for Security Policy, a well-respected organization that assists law enforcement and the military. He is a former Pentagon official who has appeared numerous times on news programs aired by Fox News Channel, Newsmax TV, CNN and others.
    “I am honored and humbled to have a range of respected voices willing to offer their best advice,” Cruz said in a statement announcing the list of foreign policy hands. “These are trusted friends who will form a core of our broader national security team,” Cruz said upon announcing the Gaffney appointment.
    The Gaffney announcement has drawn intense criticism from the Southern Poverty Law Center, which many critics claim is a left-wing front-group for the Democrat Party that lists Christian, Jewish and other organizations as being “hate groups.”  SPLC stated that Gaffney is“gripped by paranoid fantasies about Muslims destroying the West from within.”
    The Southern Poverty Law Center claims that Gaffney “is now one of America’s most notorious Islamophobes.”
    In its review of Gaffney — and what many in law enforcement consider his valuable work — SPLC wrote: “If Frank Gaffney Jr. had his way, average hard-working Americans of the Muslim faith would be dragged before Congress to face such questions as, “Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood?” In Gaffney’s mind, America is in peril, and bringing back the notorious Cold War-era House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) would expose the subversives he imagines are working to implement Shariah religious law throughout the land.”
    “That group [Southern Poverty Law Center] is hardly an unbiased watchdog. In fact, it’s reviews sound more like a leftist hit list of groups that must be stopped,” said Sid Franes, a former police detective and intelligence operative. “It’s just another ACLU wannabe without the big budget,” he added.
    Political strategist Mike Baker believes that news organizations find the SPLC a convenient tool that provides quotes for them to hide behind. “If ABC or CNN wish to denigrate a GOP candidate all they need to so is call on SPLC and they get exactly what they’re looking for. Then they claim they’re not editorializing in the news stories since it was SPLC criticizing someone,” Baker noted.
    During the Reagan Administration, the 62-year-old Gaffney served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs and he holds both bachelor and master degrees from Georgetown University and Johns Hopkins University respectively.

    Comments Off on News media attack Cruz national security advisor appointee

    World Leaders Want Hillary: Best President Money Can buy

    March 16th, 2016

    By Jim Kouri.

    On Sunday’s televised CNN Democratic Townhall, Democratic Party heir apparent to the White House Hillary Clinton boasted that World leaders are contacting her privately to ask if they can endorse her. She also said they wish to help her presidential campaign in order to stop Donald Trump specifically. Hillary claims that world leader believe a Trump presidency would hurt their relationships with the United States and we would see a decline in America’s standing in the world.

    The woman who many Americans believe is dishonest and untrustworthy said to CNN moderator, Jake Tapper, “I am already receiving messages from leaders, and I am having foreign leaders ask if they can endorse me to stop Donald Trump.” Clinton then added she told them not to endorse her.

    “No, this is up to the Americans people, but thank you very much,” she claims she told the “world’s leaders.”  However, she did say she was going to keep their names in reserve in case she needs them.

    When asked by Tapper if she’d liked to identify any of the leaders who have endorsed her, Clinton declined to name even one. Some political strategists believe she may have gotten the idea of using anonymous leaders from Secretary of State John Kerry, who used the same rationale for voting for him when he ran against President George W. Bush.  Unfortunately for Kerry, some reporters received information that no world leaders wanted to endorse the former Vietnam agitator and protester.

    “With Hillary Clinton’s track record of telling lies, half-truths and her general cavalier attitude towards the truth, I doubt anyone wants her as president unless they believe she’d be a weakling like President Barack Obama who is arguably way over his head as Commander in Chief,” said former police official and political consultant Gene Benedetto. “I’d wouldn’t be surprised if those world leaders Hillary is talking about are from Iran, Russia, China, Venezuela and Cuba,” said Benedetto.

    According to former police intelligence operative Joseph Hallerin, there may be some truth to foreign governments wishing a Hillary Clinton presidency. “She has a lot to offer them: she may become  — like her husband Bill — the best President of the United States that money can buy. And I mean that literally.”

     

    The tactics being used against Donald Trump and Republicans are straight out of the Democratic Party's textbook.

     

    Benedetto then gave a number of reasons that world leaders would indeed endorse Hillary Rodham Clinton for President.

    * She can be counted on to try to avoid videotapes, audiotapes and telephone conversations in order to avoid having the truth circulated in the media. She would be a wealth of information especially classified intelligence for foreign intelligence services since she has already shown that protection of intelligence gathering and analysis isn’t on her list of priorities.

    * Benghazi has shown that she’s much like her former boss, Obama, when it comes to a terrorist attack on Americans overseas. Obama went to bed while no one knows where Hillary went during the 13-hour Battle of Benghazi that left four Americans dead including her “close friend.”

    * She has shown she’s more interested in her imagine than the lives of men and women who serve the nation overseas.  In fact, family members of the Benghazi victims said she faulted a YouTube video for the attack and covered up the Islamic terrorism movtive.

    * Russia’s President Vladimir Putin is sure to want Clinton who achieved a certain amount of fame with her so-called Russian-Reset. Clinton failed miserably in her attempt to “reset” the U.S. relationship with Russia. She put herself “in the category of people who wanted to do more in reaction to the annexation of Crimea,” insisting that the Russian government’s objective is “to stymie, to confront, to undermine American power whenever and wherever they can.”

    * There are a number of psychiatric and psychological experts who have told anyone who would listen that Hillary Clinton — much like Barack Obama and her husband Bill Clinton — possesses some of the same personality traits as serial killers as profiled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Behavioral Science Unit. That doesn’t mean she’s a killer, just that she shares their sociopath characteristics.

    * International terrorists and organized crime leaders who have government leaders on their “payrolls” will surely benefit from a continuation of the weak and indecisive American leadership. Hillary has always held law enforcement in contempt and probably feels the same way about the military. In her world view, these brave men and women are the enemy.

    * During Barack Obama’s two campaigns, the news media blacked-out the endorsement for Obama from the New Black Panther Party, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and other less than reputable organizations. Look for the news media to do likewise for Clinton. Although reporters had no problem linking the media’s favorite racist David Duke to Donald Trump.

    Comments Off on World Leaders Want Hillary: Best President Money Can buy

    Rep. Gowdy’s report: 75th witness testifies on Battle of Benghazi cover up

    February 21st, 2016

    By Jim Kouri.

    “[The Democrats’] motivations are obvious: they’ve endorsed the former Secretary of State for president, and will no doubt continue to act as a full-fledged arm of her campaign, wasting taxpayer dollars on everything but getting answers for the families of the victims who were left without adequate security on Sept. 11, 2012, in one of the most dangerous places in the world.” – Rep. Trey Gowdy, February 2016. 

    On Tuesday, the House Select Committee on Benghazi privately interviewed its 75th witness to date, questioning Matt Olsen, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center. Olsen was the first administration official to publicly call the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi a “terrorist attack,” doing so on Sept. 19, 2012, eight days after the attack.

    According to the Committee Chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy, “The Select Committee has made enormous progress this month. We interviewed a top State Department official, Patrick Kennedy, and after months and months of quiet negotiations with the White House, we finally were able to question both Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes.”

    “In addition, just last week, the committee gained access to crucial national security records we sought for nearly a year. [These are] records no other investigation has seen,” claims Rep. Gowdy.

    “While there are still witnesses to talk to and documents to review, these significant breakthroughs are big wins that will help the committee complete the most comprehensive investigation into what happened before, during and after the Benghazi terrorist attacks, and release a report as soon as possible,” the Republican leader said.

    Prior to the Select Committee’s investigation, no congressional committee had interviewed Susan Rice or Ben Rhodes about Benghazi. The Select Committee was established in May 2014 after the Obama administration defied a congressional subpoena and refused to turn over an email written by Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes .

    So far, 59 of the 75 witnesses interviewed by the committee had never before been interviewed by Congress. The Select Committee is also the first and only Benghazi investigation to include roughly 70,000 new pages of documents – including the Secretary of State’s emails – and the first to even request access to Ambassador Chris Stevens’ emails.

    Clinton and her media sycophants have a working strategy thanks to the short memory span of Democrats and others.

    While members of the Washington press corps ignored much of the alleged shenanigans of the Democrats on the Benghazi Committee, especially Rep. Elijah Cummings, Chairman Gowdy has complained they’ve contributed nothing to the committee although they spent one-third of the budget to obstruction and making misleading statements to cooperative news media members.

    Chairman Gowdy said, “While Democrats on the Benghazi Committee have made a big show of pretending to care about the cost of this investigation, they’ve made zero meaningful contributions and spent virtually all of their time and effort on undermining and obstructing the committee’s work, directly contributing to its length and cost.”

    He and other Republicans noted that the Committee’s Democrats’ spending has topped $2 million, or more than one-third of the committee’s total cost.

    “Their incessant politicization of legitimate congressional oversight is appalling and grotesque, and only proves that the process could have been completed much faster if Democrats had helped with the work instead of delay it. Of course, their motivations are obvious: they’ve endorsed the former Secretary of State for president, and will no doubt continue to act as a full-fledged arm of her campaign, wasting taxpayer dollars on everything but getting answers for the families of the victims who were left without adequate security on September 11 in one of the most dangerous places in the world,” Gowdy said.

    Officials with the non-profit Special Operations Speaks (SOS), a group representing for special forces soldiers, sailors and Marines, responded to Gowdy’s report with a statement:  “Much is owed the men who sacrificed their all at Benghazi.  This is especially the case concerning uncovering the truth in getting to the answers to the critical questions of the families of THE BENGHAZI FOUR.  It is our absolute intent to leave no stone unturned as we seek to uncover the TRUTH concerning the cover-ups and lies surrounding the national tragedy of Benghazi that occurred on Sept 11, 2012, or any other pertinent matter that affects U.S. national security and the well-being of our great nation.”

    Matt Olsen, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, tells Charlie that “we all were treating [the Benghazi raid] as a terrorist attack” the night of the incident. Olsen also talks about ISIS, the NSA leaks.

    Comments Off on Rep. Gowdy’s report: 75th witness testifies on Battle of Benghazi cover up

    Epidemic of Muslim ‘refugee’ rapes of women in European cities covered up

    January 11th, 2016

    By Jim Kouri.

    “Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are so concerned about the phony ‘war on women’ in the U.S., but are silent regarding the Muslim refugees’ acts of violence and rape in Western nations that help them and give them asylum.” – former city police detective Benjamin Knudsen’

    While political leaders in the United States argue about Muslim refugees being brought into American cities, they may wish to hear from police chiefs in cities throughout the European Union that have opened their “gates” to tens of thousands of Islamic refugees from Middle Eastern and African nations. According to reports from police departments in Germany, Sweden, France, Great Britain and other Western nations, rapes, sexual assaults and other sex crimes perpetrated by Muslims have reached epidemic levels. 

    In the aftermath of one recent series of rampant sex crimes, a police chief in the German city of Cologne, succumbed to calls for his resignation following the German public’s display of outrage and anger over the sexual assaults against German women by hundreds of Muslim men during the New Year’s Eve celebration.

    The 60-year-old Cologne police chief, Wolfgang Albers, took his early retirement pension and ran amid rabid complaints that police officers failed to respond and protect almost 200 women who were harassed, threatened, groped, robbed and raped on Dec. 31, 2015.

    Defenders of the Muslims and the progressive politicians in Germany, defended Chief Albers by claiming he is being scapegoated by those who are opposed to Germany’s unprecedented Muslim immigrantion “tsunami.”  Germany was one of the first countries to allow thousands of Muslim immigrants seeking asylum to enter the country without even a semblance of a screening process.

    “Police officers had to ‘stand down’ as tens of thousands of people from Syria, Iraq, Somalia and other countries took advantage of German sympathy. The Germans have taken political-correctness to levels that have reached absurdity,” said former city police detective Benjamin Knudsen. “If Obama gets his way, Americans can expect the same or worse,” Knudsen told Conservative Base’s Jim Kouri.

    Now that the German public is aware of their government’s cover-up of Muslim violence, Cologne’s Mayor Henriette Reker, who is said to be a pro-Muslim

    German rape victim known as Michelle X has become a symbol of political correctness gone mad.
    German rape victim known as Michelle X has become a symbol of political correctness.

    politician, blamed the police for withhold vital information about the sex crimes committed by Islamic immigrants. Chief Albers simply called her statement “a lie.”

    Police department reports revealed that officers were overwhelmed by a mob of more than 1,000 Muslim men  who brutally attacked women who were mostly German citizens during the New Year’s Eve festivities. The cops and prosecuting attorneys have so far identified bout 30 suspects. They claim they are positive that at least 18 suspects are actually asylum seekers from the Middle East and North Africa. Some of the perpetrators are likely Muslim German citizens or visa-holders.

    One of the victims, only identified as 18-year-old Michelle X, told reporters that she and her friends were walking near the city cathedral when “suddenly 20 to 30 men surrounded us. And more and more came. Michelle said the Arab men roughly rubbed her legs, buttocks, and breasts and attempted to remove her clothes.

    In the city of Rhein, also in Germany, two teenage girls were viciously raped repeatedly by a gang of at least four Syrians as part of a multi-city rampage of sexual assaults by Muslims in about a dozen cities in Europe New Year’s Eve.

    The European Union countries are being inundated with a Muslim rape epidemic that is hard to gauge because of government’s covering up Muslim-related crimes. Even the U.S. has gone “over the top” in its efforts to avoid linking Islam to acts of violence.

    Under Sharia law, sexually violent acts are not only permitted when it comes to non-Muslim women, but Islamists are encouraged in the name of trying to convert them to Islam.

    “Rapes have skyrocketed in England, Sweden, Germany and Norway during the past few years after they took in millions of Muslim refugees and migrants from the Middle East and North Africa. Sweden, which once boasted extremely low instances of rape, is now considered the “rape capital of the West.” Gang rapes in Sweden have escalated exponentially between 1995 and 2006, and the culprits in most cases were refugees or migrants from Muslim countries,” according to ZDF editor-in-chief wrote on Facebook.  

    There has been a widespread European media blackout of this news because Swedes, Germans, Norwegians and Brits fear being labeled racist or Islamophobic. In the U.K., the press even refers to Muslim criminals as “Asian” instead of “Arab” or “Muslim” so as to not anger its large Muslim population.

    “German TV station, ZDF, apologized for not reporting the sex attacks amid reports they had been ordered by German Chancellor Angela Merkel to censor or soften its coverage of crimes committed by Muslim refugees and immigrants,” according to ZDF TV.

    Published in conservativebase.com

    Comments Off on Epidemic of Muslim ‘refugee’ rapes of women in European cities covered up