By Jaime Ortega.
A document that springs from the past into the future
The unclassified document composed in 1996 by a team of researchers exposes the willingness of the U.S. Government to control the weather as a form of ultimate weaponry, and begs a series of serious questions into what could be causing these violent climate streams other than mother nature.
Tornado rages through Oklahoma, 2013, May 20
Understanding the problem to understand the document:
This idea started back in 1983 by world re-known scientist Nikola Tesla. He proposed that Low Frequency Radio rays sent into the ionosphere could cause atmospheric impacts worldwide and produce an ultimate weather weapon.
“Rays could destroy 10,000 airplanes at a distance of 250 miles,” Nikola Tesla.
As a result of his genius idea, many governments started funding Ionospheric projects secretly. The most notorious project was the case electromagnetic plant in Yekateringburg, Russia.
http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/04-09-2008/106296-electromagnetic_super_weapon-0/
But with great power comes great responsibility:
Unfortunately for the media, accessing data of The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) has proven almost impossible as the only way they can be reached is via e-mail (which raises a few questions). No one has corresponded back with us or to other networks to expose vital information about the project.
But the information inside their website (link below) does indeed state that HAARP is used for much more than “investigating the Ionosphere.”
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/learn.html
Aerial view of the HAARP site, looking towards Mount Sanford, Alaska.
Currently there are 34 of these Ionospheric plants scattered all over the world. And China and Russia have their own plants. In the U.S. there are three plants; two in Alaska and one located in Puerto Rico close to the formation and birth place of hurricanes.
Site in Russia: All-Russian ElectroTechnical Institute’s “high-voltage scientific research center”
Defense Advance Research Project Agency (DARPA) is involved in the HAARP project and so is BAE systems from the United Kingdom.
“DARPA,” as quoted by Marcus J. Ranum (a re-known cyber-security systems expert and contributor for The Daily Journalist) “is much alike a Zombie that keeps getting publicly clubbed but keeps getting resurrected mysteriously.”
DARPA works alongside the Intelligence Community and is involved in serious controversial programs like the Total Information Awareness program (TIA), which is an attempt to collect all data available into one digital storage system for unknown classified purposes.
The series of violent tornadoes that occurred in Oklahoma and the Midwest, that took the lives of 24 people, raises vital questions in the futility and unknown responsibility these secret military programs pose to weather and atmospheric conditions.
By no means, I state my claims to be factual proof of anything other than curiosity, but when documents like the one bellow are written, the mind of any logical journalist starts to question previously unknown paradoxes other than mother nature. It’s up to you to decide.
The document
Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025
Executive Summary.
In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather” by capitalizing on emerging technologies and
focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war
fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact
operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this
paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military
objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.
A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control,weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.
Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification
capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information
gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some
intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.vii
Table 1
Operational Capabilities Matrix
DEGRADE ENEMY FORCES ENHANCE FRIENDLY FORCES
Precipitation Enhancement Precipitation Avoidance
– Flood Lines of Communication – Maintain/Improve LOC
– Reduce PGM/Recce Effectiveness – Maintain Visibility
– Decrease Comfort Level/Morale – Maintain Comfort Level/Morale
Storm Enhancement Storm Modification
– Deny Operations – Choose Battlespace Environment
Precipitation Denial Space Weather
– Deny Fresh Water – Improve Communication Reliability
– Induce Drought – Intercept Enemy Transmissions
Space Weather – Revitalize Space Assets
– Disrupt Communications/Radar
– Disable/Destroy Space Assets Fog and Cloud Generation
– Increase Concealment
Fog and Cloud Removal Fog and Cloud Removal
– Deny Concealment – Maintain Airfield Operations
– Increase Vulnerability to PGM/Recce – Enhance PGM Effectiveness
Detect Hostile Weather Activities Defend against Enemy Capabilities
Current technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone who has the necessary
resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale.
Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the
impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability. In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition.
Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potentialadversaries.viii
In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace
dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space
superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness.1“The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;”2
in 2025 we can “Own the Weather.”
Notes
To Read More About this Controversial Document: http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
