Gary Yantis Answers Questions About HAARP

The Expert.

 

Gary Yantis

Gary Yantis is a consultant at Infinite Dangers, Inc.

And has been involved in Defense&Space for Honeywell and Midtec Associates. 


Why is HAARP important for studying the Ionosphere? Is the US the only country to develop such technology and are there other similar programs world wide?

1.  There are 34 facilities that I know of scattered all over the world.  Many can be seen using Google Earth.  Some are much larger than HAARP in Alaska.

Here is a list of the 34 facilities.  This can be found on WikiIntelNews.   Some of these are not “HAARP like” at all and should not be on this list.  An example is Arecibo.  That is a radio telescope – nothing like HAARP at all.  I’d guess if all of these sites were investigated you would cut the list down to between ten and twenty HAARP-like facilities.  Who owns and/or controls each one on foreign soil is a question people ask but is never answered.

 

Arecibo, Puerto Rico
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia (SURA) Kwajalein,
Marshall Islands São Luiz Space Observatory, Brazil
Millstone Hill Radio Observatory (EISCAT-like facility), Westford, Massachusetts
Platteville Atmospheric Observatory (The first American HAARP, Colorado)
High Power Auroral Stimulation Observatory (HIPAS), Fairbanks Alaska
Nerc MST Radar Facility (NMRF) (HAARP-like facility), Carmarthenshire, Wales, United Kingdom
National MST Radar Facility (NMRF) (HAARP-like facility), southern Andra Pradesh, India
Jicamarca Radio Observatory, (HAARP-like facility but MUCH BIGGER), Lima, Peru
Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN) Laverton, West Australia
(This is an Over-The-Horizon Radar (OTH-R) facility) – see also this PA thread)
Chatanika Incoherent Scatter Facility, Poker Flats, near Chatanika, Alaska
URDF-3 (Unidentified Research and Development Facility-3) Baikal-1, Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan
Tesla Generators? at Sychëvka, Moskovskaya Oblast (Russia)
Duga Radar Array (“The Russian Woodpecker”), Chenobyl, Ukraine
China Research Institute of Radiowave Propagation (CRIRP) (HAARP-like facility),Ionospheric Laboratory, Xinjiang (Sinkiang) Region, China
Zhong Shan Antarctic Polar Station (China)
Sheshan Radio Observatory (EISCAT-like facility), Shanghai, China
Digisonde Portable Sounder (DPS), Svalbard, Norway
(“can be applied to identify and track irregularities generated by high power HF transmitters as planned for HAARP experiments in Alaska.”)
Harold E. Holt Naval Communication Station, Western Australia AND THE MOTHER OF ALL HAARP ANTENNAE GROUPS SuperDARN (Super Dual Auroral Radar Network)

SuperDARN is an international radar network for studying the upper atmosphere and ionosphere, comprising eleven radars in the northern hemisphere and seven in the southern hemisphere that operate in the High Frequency (HF) bands between 8 and 22 MHz. The radars measure the Doppler velocity of plasma density irregularities in the ionosphere.

Some scientist claim HAARP could be used to instantaneously paralyze and take down an aircraft flying, Is this true or false? 

2.  HAARP in Alaska even though it is far from being the largest is the only one talked about because the US government decided circa 1970 they would be completely open with information to limit conspiracy theories.  This openness has not worked for them and only focused attention only on them but not the others. Some of the other governments denied their existence until shown satellite photos.  Russia and China both have a number of HAARP facilities in their far north.  Most are larger than HAARP Alaska.

Many people (some conspiracist ) are concerned about HAARP’s capabilities. Out of all you heard what is the most credible one, if any is factually true?

3.  I have heard, read and seen (videos) dozens of “theories” of what HAARP Alaska is and what it does.  Since none of them have ever had even one piece of evidence other than people guessing I can’t select one over others saying “this one is most credible”.  You might want to spend time on YouTube watching the dozens of videos with various “guesses” as to what HAARP is.

 Some people believe HAARP could be used to warm up the Ionosphere and create different weather patterns, is this true or false?

 4.  Changing the weather is one of the dozens of theories.  There has been no direct correlation but I keep watching.  I keep an open mind.

The upper atmosphere has been decreasing for hundreds of years. For so long that mankind using aresol cans cannot be blamed for it or at least the primary blame.  It’s been said that has lead to “chem trails” which is a gas released from aircraft that contains tiny pieces of aluminm. They are supposed to go further up to the upper atmosphere.  If their was no upper atmosphere there would be no life on earth.  There is just the right amount to allow enough sunlight (uv rays) for photosynthesis to take place to grow crops etc. but not so much that the uv rays burn planet earth.  It is believed that is what happened to Mars.   Mars was once fertile just like earth with water and perhaps even life.  But the atmosphere was lost and the sun’s rays turned Mars into a burning lifeless globe circling the sun.  Long-term scientists hope to reintroduce an atmosphere to Mars to see if water and life would return.  Impossible today that is the goal for, like, science in the year 3,000.  Did mankind come from Mars arriving here after their planet was burnt up.  Some people think so but there is no proof.

HAARP is used for the ionosphere, but could it also be potentially used as a weapon also? How much energy can HAARP emit when used? 

5.  Reading the words on their Website (which is the only “concrete” information I am aware of) they say HAARP is to “study the upper atmosphere”.  In other papers they admit to it being used to turn the upper atmosphere solid enough (plasma) to reflect RADAR signals.  This allows OTH (over the horizon) RADAR being able to track missiles, planes etc. for thousands of miles instead of the limitation of a few hundred miles that a ground based RADAR has.  Even RADAR on an aircraft at 30,000 feet up can only “see” 400 to 500 miles.

Is HAARP’s technology ever been tested on humans accidentally or incidentally? Could HAARP magnetic radiation (plasma) cause brain malfunctions on a massive scale?

6- There are many videos on YT by people who are “positive” HAARP does a certain thing or things.  But none have any proof. You might want to contact some of them for their guesses.  Personally, I stay with proven science which, for HAARP, thus far is limited to what is written on their Web site.  

 Is the fact that DARPA’s association with HAARP’s programs, could raise suspicion, considering DARPA’s other controversial projects.? 

7-  DARPA is the agency that is involved in early activity of this type.  Nothing unusual about that.  DARPA is supposed to “look” into future and figure out how to bring it to today’s world.

Leave a Reply

You must be Logged in to post comment.

What Next?

Recent Articles